The Absurdity of Moroccan Debate: Invisible hands, Fear mongering and WhatAbout-eries

There’s certainly a number of pervasive rhetorics, deeply rooted in Arabic culture, that seem to surface during every discussion with a slightest hint of Arab politics. Arguments that, albeit tremendously misleading and erroneous, are overly used by media outlets , Arab intellectuals and even leaders. A quick , and amateurish, comparative media study will reveal for example how conspiracy theorists (Glenn beck, 911 “truthers”, birthers, NWO advocates etc…) are ridiculed in western media while their Arabic counterparts are tolerated, even celebrated at times. This hasty tendency to lean towards distorted thinking causes serious repercussions on Arabs’ ability to properly reason vis-a-vis significant political events.

The “aggressive” campaign lead recently by the Moroccan government and its minions to promote the “Moroccan exception” image raised many suspicions among the outspoken Moroccan dissidents . It should be noted that the phrase was first coined by French Le Monde to praise the transparency of the latest Moroccan parliamentary elections, way before good Ole Naciri gave the newspaper a taste of their own medicine. Incidentally, the phrase “Tunisian Miracle” was also coined by France’s Jacques Chirac refering to the country’s “exceptional” socio-economic situation. Because of this uncanny resemblance, 30 milion Moroccans knocked on wood; Lmrabet, Jamai and Moulay Hicham however, didnt.

Le Journal was an elaborate Algerian plan to threaten our territorial sovereignty

When the contrarian self-exiled trinity came out to the Spanish media with alarmist analyses on the possibility of turmoil reaching Morocco, all hell broke loose. Ordinarily, in a country that claims to be an “isle of democracy and freedom of expression”, reactions consisting of smear campaigns and Ad Hominem attacks are to be expected in parallel with reasonable criticism and healthy debates. What’s surprising however is for the former discourse of response to be most orthodox and prevailing amid the populate and, even worse, the entirety of mainstream media. Evidently, when the minister of youth himself, Moncef Belkhayat, accuses those peacefully exercising their constitutional rights of being “enemies” who target our territorial sovereignty, the possibility of a constructive discussion is eliminated. A cheap appeal to faux patriotism in all its glory; exploiting the country’s most treasured cause to dissuade Moroccans from non-conformist political views. Its no surprise that this type of overly incendiary rhetorics prevails and trumps rational debate; Reductio Ad Sahara is Moroccans’ Reductio Ad Absurdum.

“Reductio Ad Sahara: A fallacy that can be better represented in the form of a slightly modified “Godwin Law”; As a discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Sahara or Polisario approaches 1.”

This false dichotomy of political landcape, ingrained into the Moroccan cultural heritage, is most detrimental towards the people in the first place. Back in the 19th century, the country was divided into Blad Lmakhzen (land of government) and Blad Siba(land of dissidence) which consisted of tribes who refused adherence to central government. Today in contemporary Darija, Moroccans with unorthodox views are accused of trying to incite Siba in the Bled on behalf of the”invisible hands” threatening our sovereignty. As a result of this aggressive rhetoric, opposition ,even when mild, is associated with dissidence, Siba and violence as opposed to L’Makhzen who’s synonymous with (illusory) stability. And people still wonder why is opposition nonexistent in this country.

Moncef Benkhayat’s misinformed comments represent Arab culture’s lack, until recently,

Protests are unpatriotic. Martin Luther King was America's enemy.

of a strong protest tradition driven by civil society. History has shown that political rallies, not revolutions, do actually spark major changes: MLK’s Wachington March, the Suffragettes movement, the Anti-Vietnam protests etc. But it seems as if no matter if you’re pro-demonstrations or not in Morocco,  there’s already a consensus on the paramount need for major constitutional reforms, a concern that in lights of ineffectual parliament and political parties, can only be expressed through peaceful protests. The predicament we have at hands is the fact that major political parties have held monopoly over peaceful  “manifestations” in the past: Palestine cause, Casa terrorist attacks, latest Sahara events. Consequently, anything that’s not government-approved would be deemed Siba-inciting and will be responded to with excessive force, perpetuating the stereotype that a non-Makhzenist protest cannot be peaceful. For those afflicted with a nasty case of Makhzen syndrom, a little fear mongering goes a long way towards preserving an ill-functioning status-quo, especially when your neighboring countries experienced civil war, a succession of coups and revolutions.

Which bring us to another fallacious yet popular rhetoric; the Whatabout-eries, formally known as Tu Quoques. After Guardian journalist Johann Hari published his article The Dark Side Of Dubai (powerful longform piece of investigative journalism), a staggering amount of the responses he got simply criticized him for targeting Dubai specifically and not other countries. Sounds absurd doesn’t it? Well, chances are that you too have used this argument in the past. From his article “How To Spot A Lame Argument

“As a rhetorical trick, it is simple. Anyone can do it, and we are all tempted sometimes. When you have lost an argument – when you can’t justify your case, and it is crumbling in your hands – you snap back: “But what about x? You then raise a totally different subject, and try to get everybody to focus on it – hoping it will distract attention from your own deflated case.”

In this video, TV “anchor” Mustapha Alaoui bashes on Aljazeera for their coverage of the Sahara and the


Irrefutable Logic. Problem Socrates ?

2006-2008 Afengou incidents. A remote village where dozens of infants died due to harsh conditions and an unresponsive government. Al Alaoui argues: “But what about Qatar ? Why doesnt Aljazeera mention the 1994 Qatari coup? Why doesnt Aljazeera shifts its focus to the gulf instead?” As you can see, his tirade was very well received. Oddly enough, AlJazeera was probaby the only channel keeping Moroccans in the loop considering the shameful absence of Moroccan media, funded by Moroccan’s tax money. A more relevant variation would be the “What about Algeria? How about you try living there instead” whenever a criticism of the “Moroccan exception” arises. Superstar columnist Rachid Nini also blatantly resorts to a similar fallacy trying to refute Moulay Hicham, Aboubakr Jamai and Ali Mrabet’s statements to the media. The list of examples is endless, but going back to Johann Hari who puts it best:

So whenever you hear the cry “But what about?!”, you can reply: what about we ignore this crude attempt to change the subject, and focus on the subject in hand?

This complete disregard of basic rhetoric principles is what makes the difference between, say, the British house of commons and the Moroccan parliament, between Oxford Debates and Aljazeera’s Opposing Views(Itijah Al Mou’akiss). 2011 seem to be the year for breaking Arabic stereotypes, and while I realize that “curing” this particular affliction can be a bit more challenging, I think we can manage to alleviate its repercussions. Why stop for example at only teaching logical and quantitative reasoning in Math classes? Rhetorics should also be taught alongside Arabic or Philosophy classes. A nation of great conversationalists and problem-solvers? what a dream. Can I get my Nobel prize already?

This entry was posted in Moroccan news, Moroccan Politics and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

14 Responses to The Absurdity of Moroccan Debate: Invisible hands, Fear mongering and WhatAbout-eries

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention The Absurdity of Moroccan Debate: Invisible hands, Fear mongering and WhatAbout-eries | Kobida --

  2. mouss says:

    Mustapha Alaoui est l’Amr Adeeb marocain. Un jour il fera son mea culpa tout en prétextant qu’il recevait des ordres et qu’il avait une famille à nourir. Tout comme lui Amr Adeeb servait des plats bien mijotés à la famille Moubarak mais une fois expulsé du Square Tahrir dernièrement et sentant que le vent a changé de direction il a fait son mea culpa avec des larmes de crocodiles :

    • roumana says:

      Ah Amr Adeeb! Le mec qui a failli lancer une guerre entre L’egypt et L’algerie. Faut qu’on leur revoque la nationalite ces types apres la revolution 😀

      Thanks for reading.

  3. fawzi says:

    A quick , and amateurish, comparative media study will reveal for example how conspiracy theorists (Glenn beck, 911 “truthers”, birthers, NWO advocates etc…) are ridiculed in western media while their Arabic counterparts are tolerated, even celebrated at times

    I don’t think we need to go that far. Just compare how millenia-old superstition and myths are treated in the Western media and the Arab media.

    If you’re wondering why rational debate is impossible in Morocco, just look at how we have institutionalized the irrational, and made illegal criticism of the supernatural and the irrational.

    You can teach logic and reason to Moroccans till you’re blue in the face, but that won’t have an impact on the culture unless you allow free-thinking to challenge religion.

    Awesome blog by the way!

    • roumana says:

      “won’t have an impact on the culture unless you allow free-thinking to challenge religion.”

      Its why Im in favor of introducing critical thinking as a class and replacing Islamic Education with Comparative Religion (or history of religions). Why should we teach students apostasy and adultery laws when we can actually teach them how to critically approach religious texts. Plus you’d be producing more moderate people. But good luck advocating this idea without being accused of proselytizing.

      Thanks for stopping by.

  4. Merlin_Pimpim says:

    I agree with Fawzi. Awesome blog. Can’t wait for your next post!

  5. mouka says:

    I would definitely vote for you for a Nobel prize. I just need to know what category?
    I just stumbled upon your blog. I think you just earned a fan for life.
    What we need are “conscience raising” facts. Your “What about X?” just raised my conscience about this old time tactic for changing the subject.
    Thanks a MILLION!!!

  6. eatbees says:

    I’m loving your eloquent blog!

    By the way, Martin Luther King, Jr. was indeed considered an enemy of America by men like J. Edgar Hoover (the Basri-like FBI director), who believed him to be an agent of godless Communism and wanton immorality.

    Morocco still has personalities like J. Edgar Hoover in politics, it seems.

    • roumana says:

      Hey there
      I think what’s most alarming is the Basri/J. Edgar Hoover-Like mentality that’s prevalent among my fellow Moroccan brethren. I guess all those years of repression are finally paying off. Its most frustrating Im telling you.
      Thanks for stopping by.

  7. Pingback: Morocco: The Tale of the February 20 Movement in 20 Videos · Global Voices

  8. Pingback: Morocco: The Tale of the February 20 Movement in 20 Videos :: Elites TV

  9. Pingback: 20 Viral Videos that Tell the Tale of Morocco’s Feb 20 Freedom & Democracy Movement | Featured, Morocco, Revolutions | Arab Stands

  10. Pingback: Maroc : Le mouvement du 20 Février raconté en 20 vidéos #20feb | Take The Square

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s